Mediation vs Going to Court
Mediation aims at settling differences through an informal dispute resolution process to which the parties involved must agree as there is no legal compulsion to enter into it unless there is a court order. Disputants who agree to mediation hope to resolve issues faster and at less cost than a formal court trial. The process rests on communication and discussion that the Mediator facilitates between the parties to bring differences and legal issues into the open.
After exchanging offers, the settlement arrived at is meant to be mutually agreeable, whether it is of a monetary or other nature. All mediations may not be successful, and there is no legal binding on any party. If agreed upon, the parties may sign the settlement. If not, the parties are free to exit the mediation process and proceed to court.
In contrast, a formal lawsuit in a court may be filed by nearly any party at any time, creating a legal obligation for the defendant to submit a response regardless of whether they consider themselves guilty or not. No aspect of the court process is optional, and summons from the court make attendance mandatory. Court appearances may stretch over months or years, making it a costly, time-consuming and laborious process, as a trial of the issues needs constant preparation.
Litigation typically begins with exchanging documents and relevant information, filing court requests, and proceeding to trial. Since the court process does not involve a mutual discussion, the parties involved cannot expect a mutually acceptable settlement of their issues. Some courts and judges mandate alternative dispute resolution to encourage pre-trial settlement. During a trial, however, the judge delivers the resolution of the legal and factual issues under consideration, and the court decision is final and binding.
Types of Mediation
Mediators are called upon when organisations and individuals wish to avoid the court process. Legal and professional matters or those of public interest require qualified mediators. Among the issues and disputes that need mediation are child custody arrangements during divorce, landlord/tenant disputes and neighbour disputes. Other disputes involve financial matters, employment matters, industrial strikes, and crime-related justice.
Mediation may take place face-to-face or through telephonic, written and virtual communication, depending on the nature of the dispute, the location of the parties, and any other legal, economic or social constraints.
Arbitrators, Mediators & Conciliators
As attorneys, business professionals or retired judges, arbitrators are usually experts in a specific field. They decide disputes as impartial third parties, working alone or on a panel of arbitrators. They may be called upon to settle procedural matters, including the evidence that may be submitted or the schedule of hearings. Some disputes may require arbitration by law. However, in other cases, agreement to go in for arbitration is voluntarily given by the disputants to avert litigation or trial in court. In either case, the parties may appeal the arbitrator’s award.
Working as neutral parties in a case, Mediators facilitate dispute resolution, but, unlike arbitrators, they do not deliver binding decisions. Their job is to guide disputants towards a viable and mutually acceptable agreement, in the absence of which the parties may opt for other pathways.
Although working in a capacity similar to that of Mediators, conciliators guide disputants towards settling a case, typically meeting each party separately. However, opposing parties decide in advance whether or not the conciliator’s recommendations will be binding.
Potential Pros & Cons of Freelancing vs Full-Time Employment
Freelancing Mediators have more flexible work schedules and locations. They have full ownership of the business and can select their projects and clients. They can target the number of cases to take each month or year and establish a fee system based on the case and the work it needs. However, they experience inconsistent work and cash flow, which means more responsibility, effort and risk.
A full-time Mediator, on the other hand, has company-sponsored health benefits, insurance, and retirement plans. They have job security with a fixed, reliable source of income and guidance from their bosses. Yet, they may experience boredom due to a lack of flexibility, ownership, and variety.
When deciding between freelancing or being a full-time employee, consider the pros and cons to see what works best for you.