A Brief Timeline of Timekeeping in Music
Timekeeping and music have ancient connections, although not necessarily clear. There likely existed various forms of conducting music - orally, using a scroll or pounding the floor with a long stick. The 18th century saw musicians, typically the organist, harpsichordist, or the chief of the first violinists, take on the duties of the “concertmaster”. Or it was the composer who also served as the conductor, however, only for his own compositions. During one period of time, the concertmasters tapped their feet, and a separate conductor clapped his hands or tapped a desk, not an ideal scenario for either the musicians or the audience.
Greek mythology mentions that something like a staff was probably used in ancient times. Batons found a place in conducting orchestral music in the eighth century and grew in popularity as orchestras grew larger. Some violinists in the 19th century used their violin bows to conduct. The baton became a widely accepted tool in the hands of a Music Conductor by the mid-19th century, although some still preferred to use their bare hands. The baton was initially large and similar to the instrument used by a drum major.
From being associated with opera only, concert music found its independence in the early 19th century. During the early days of conducting, Music Conductors faced the audience rather than the orchestra. Some also regularly cut and reorchestrated the compositions they conducted, a practice that has continued. Some conductors eschewed the baton and used their bare hands. This practice was never widely adopted in modern times, although a few great conductors did prefer it. Another innovation was using the total score by Music Conductors instead of reading from the first violinist’s part.
It was in the 20th century that numerous excellent conductors came to the forefront of music, including women in the second half of the century. Several conducting styles also emerged in the 20th century, including extremely exhibitionistic ones. Some Music Conductors assumed full, autocratic command of the orchestra, insisting on strict obedience from the musicians in carrying out the conductor’s interpretation of the music. Others were more flexible. Attempts to form conductorless orchestras to avoid temperamental or dictatorial Music Conductors were largely unsuccessful.
Variations in Technique, Style & Tone
Conducting is a highly individual art and skill, with no prescribed right or wrong ways. Their baton technique, along with arm and body movements, spotlights the uniqueness of Music Conductors. Some use reserved and minimal movements, while others use sweeping strokes and gestures. Styles are as varied as Music Conductors themselves and the scores they conduct. Contrasting methods produce equally spectacular results. Some Conductors go into a frenzy of emotion; others practice restraint. Some focus on every nuance of the score, others only on some parts during rehearsal. The sound of an orchestra is synonymous with the conductor, its tone a recognisable signature. This aspect and quality of tone, in particular, is determined by how the conductor uses diverse orchestral sections, such as the brass section, which can create a range of sounds from bright, sharp, and piercing to rich, resonant, and heavy, or the strings that can alter the vibrato to produce a thick, lush tone or a thinner, more delicate sound.
Responsibility for Quality
Whatever the style or baton technique Music Conductors choose to adopt, the rehearsal techniques they use are considered the primary determinants of the quality of an ensemble’s musical output. Rehearsals are when they detect and correct the orchestra’s musical, interpretive, rhythmic, balance, and intonation problems. To achieve complete satisfaction with the ensemble’s readiness for performance, they work with each orchestral unit and the choir in entirety, including soloist instrumentalists and singers and the chorus.
Potential Pros & Cons of Freelancing vs Full-Time Employment
Freelancing offers Music Conductors freedom regarding flexible schedules, working hours, and location. They have full ownership of the business and can afford selectivity in terms of the variety of projects and clients presented. While it has unlimited earning potential, freelancing comes with less stability and security, with inconsistent work and cash flow. There is more responsibility, effort, and risk involved. There are no paid holidays, and sick/maternity/paternity leaves are almost unaffordable. There is the added pressure of a self-employment tax and no eligibility for unemployment benefits.
A full-time Music Conductor, on the other hand, has access to company-sponsored health benefits, insurance, and retirement plans. They have job security with a fixed, reliable source of income and guidance from their bosses. Despite that, they are susceptible to potential boredom and inability to pursue passion projects due to their lack of time or effort. With a lack of flexibility, ownership, and variety, there is also a need to budget extra money for commuting and attire costs.
When deciding between freelancing or being a full-time employee, consider the pros and cons to see what works best for you.