Macroeconomics vs. Microeconomics
Macroeconomics deals with the performance, structure, and behavior of the entire economy. Microeconomics is more focused on the choices made by individual actors in the economy (like people, households, industries, etc.).
Key Questions
Macroeconomists seek answers to questions such as “What causes unemployment? What causes inflation? What creates or stimulates economic growth?” They attempt to measure how well an economy is performing, to understand what forces drive it, and to project how performance can improve.
Macroeconomics may be split into two broad areas for research purposes.
Economic Growth
Beginning with Adam Smith’s An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, economic growth is commonly modeled as a function of physical and human capital, labor force and technology which support development, progress, and rising living standards.
Business Cycles
Major macroeconomic variables such as employment and national output go through occasional fluctuations up or down, expansions and recessions in a phenomenon known as the business cycle. The Great Depression of the 1930s was the impetus for the development of most macroeconomic theories.
Keynesian Economics
Macroeconomics owes its current avatar to John Maynard Keynes and his book, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Keynes proffered the theory that aggregate demand is the principal factor in issues like unemployment and the business cycle.
The business cycle can be managed by active government intervention through fiscal policy (spending more in recessions to stimulate demand) and monetary policy (stimulating demand with lower rates). Sticky prices prevent the proper clearing of supply and demand.
Freelance Vs. Full-Time Work
Freelancing offers Macroeconomists freedom with regard to flexible schedules, working hours, and location. They have full ownership of the business and can afford selectivity in terms of the variety of projects and clients presented.
While it has unlimited earning potential, freelancing has less stability and security, with inconsistent work and cash flow. There is more responsibility, effort, and risk involved. There are no paid holidays, and sick/maternity/paternity leaves are almost unaffordable. There is the added pressure of a self-employment tax and no eligibility for unemployment benefits.
A full-time Macroeconomist, however, has access to company-sponsored health benefits, insurance, and retirement plans. They have job security with a fixed, reliable source of income and guidance from their bosses.
Despite the above benefits, full-time employees are susceptible to potential boredom and inability to pursue passion projects due to their lack of time or effort. There is a lack of flexibility, ownership, and variety, compounded by the need to set aside funds for commuting and attire costs.
When deciding between freelancing or being a full-time employee, consider the pros and cons to see what works best for you.