FLASH SALE: 25% Off Certificates & Diplomas! Sale ends on Saturday, 29th February 2020Claim My 25% Discount
Factors Affecting Organizational Capacity for Change
Leadership and Management
The Importance of Trust
“The glue that holds all relationships together-including the relationship between the leader and the led-is trust, and trust is based on integrity.” – Brian Tracy
Trustworthiness can be thought of as the quality of someone being competent and benevolent so that others can safely be in partnership with that person.
As Brian Tracy suggests earlier, trustworthiness is important to all human relationships, but it is essential for leadership effectiveness and the ability to prepare for and drive organizational change.
The Importance of the Leader
All change requires a partnership between leaders and followers.
In any partnership situation, the leader must first demonstrate competence. After all, why should anyone follow the leader if the leader first does not demonstrate skill or competence in envisioning the future, making that vision a reality, or both?
Certainly, followers are compliant every day with those in authority, but compliance is largely effective only in stable and unchanging situations. In unstable and changing situations, a trusting disposition among a critical mass of the employees is essential.
If the followers’ disposition is largely compliant, change will be temporary or nonexistent.
If the leader cannot generate a following, chances of successful change are diminished!
Practices for Cultivating Trustworthy Leadership in Your Organization
There is no recipe or formula for building trustworthy leadership within an organization.
Human beings are too variable for a recipe and human relationships come in all shapes and sizes. After all, leadership development is an “inside job” that requires character development, and character development.
However, there are some behavioral principles for those individuals and organizations seeking to make their organizations more change capable.
Try to implement some of the following practices in your organization to build trust!
Practice 1: Become Skillful in Leading Others
Leadership takes skill and all skills can be developed over time. Without previous experiences in leading others through a change initiative, it is not possible to become a trustworthy leader.
Hence, anything that an organization can do to accelerate and enhance the leadership skills of its managers will yield long- term benefits in also enhancing the organization’s capacity to change. 
However, having a formal leadership development program is not enough to generate skillful leaders.
Click here for an example
In a recent review of these programs at eight major corporations, the differentiating factor that separated the successful programs from the unsuccessful programs was whether or not personal follow-up was part of the program or not.
Personal follow-up involved such things as reminder notes to keep working on the development plan, one-on-one sessions with an executive coach or peer, and sufficient time and resources to work on important attitudes and behaviors unfolding in real time. In other words, leadership development is a contact sport. 
Practice 2: Learn How to Speak With and Listen to Associates
One of the problems with much that has been written about leadership and communication is that too much has been focused on telling the rest of the organization what the leader wants to do and helping to persuade the organization that resistance to change is a bad idea.
This is only part of what is required.
In order to build the leader-follower relationship, time and energy must be invested so that fears, concerns, and doubts can be expressed, alternative viewpoints can be discussed, and challenges to the vision can be articulated.
Practice 2: Learn How to Speak With and Listen to Associates (Continued)
Most change initiatives fail because they do not consider the emotional aspects associated with change, and trustworthy leadership that communicates well can be an important antidote to counteract that obstacle to change.
Indeed, noted author and change guru John Kotter argues that it is important to understand what people are feeling and to speak more directly to their anxieties, confusion, anger, and distrust. 
Click here for an example
Interestingly, recent research reveals that the more communication that goes on between executives, the more trustworthy the communicators view each other to be.
In a study of 50 senior managers within a multinational firm, it was reported that those executives who communicated more often were more likely to view others in the organization as more trustworthy.  Perhaps this is why interactive communication forums such as town hall meetings, online blogs, and two-way video sessions are becoming staples of organizational life.
Practice 3: Know Your Values and Act With Integrity
A key element of trustworthiness is consistency over time. The best way to be consistent is to know your values and act in concert with those values.
If the leader or leaders are not clear about what their values are and what values they want to emphasize within the organization, they are likely to send out mixed messages to the rest of the organization.
Subordinates pay attention to what leaders say and do. When the message changes, or more importantly, when the message stays the same and the leader’s actions are not consistent with that message, trust is destroyed.
Click here for an example
One of the key factors noted in Ford’s recent success as compared to General Motors’s and Chrysler’s struggles was described as “talking the walk, and walking the talk.”  In other words, Ford executives were able to build up more trust with their employees than executives at the other Detroit firms.
Knowing your values and acting consistently with them is harder to do than one would think, but building trust in the absence of consistency between espoused and enacted values is virtually impossible.
Practice 4: Think “Win-Win” as Much as Possible
If employees are to trust their leaders, they need to know that their leaders genuinely care about them.
This doesn’t mean that the leader must avoid conflicts and “play nice” all the time. It does mean that employees know that the leaders of the organization are not just in the game for themselves.
Pragmatically speaking, leaders must seek win-win options as much as possible and employees need to know that the leader is looking to create a win for them.  In other words, followers want to know that you care about them before they are willing to trust you and follow you. 
Click here for additional information
Interestingly, organizations that went from being good to great were all led by relatively humble leaders who were more focused on building the organization than on their own well-being.
Humility is not a traditional aspect used to describe effective leaders, but it is consistent with generating the organizational trust necessary to pursue a bold new vision, change initiative, or both. In sum, caring about the well-being of the entire organization and putting its well-being on a par with your own is essential for building organizational change capacity.
Practice 5: Be Authentic and Human; You Don’t Have to Be Perfect
Because the building of a trusting relationship takes time, it is not a one-time event. n order to build trust within an organization, it is more important to be authentic and human than it is to be perfect.
When a mistake is made by a leader, it should be owned and acknowledged. Sometimes publicly; sometimes privately.
“Apologies can create the conditions for constructive change. An apology can also serve to strengthen an organization. Apologizing by admitting a mistake tends to generate confidence in one’s leadership. To apologize is to comprehend and acknowledge one’s error, it requires that the truth be told without minimizing or the behavior.” 
Part of authenticity is being candid and transparent. However, leaders should selectively reveal their weaknesses since too much disclosure can be inappropriate in certain times and places. 
In other words, it is possible to overdo this candor and undermine one’s trustworthiness.
Practice 6: Seek Respect, Not Friendship, From Your Subordinates
Organizational leaders need to earn the trust and respect of their followers. However, this does not mean that leaders need to be friends with their coworkers.
Friendship at work is a wonderful thing, but far more important is the respect that others have for the leadership of the organization. Respect is earned through being fair and just. And fairness applies to not only what the policy is but also how the policy is implemented.
Indeed, recent research found that employee openness to change was even more influenced by how justly the policy was implemented than by how fair the policy was perceived to be in actual substance. 
Practice 7: Trust Others a Bit More; Control Them a Little Less
Relationships are reciprocal in nature. There must be give and take for them to work properly.
If leaders want the organization to trust them, then they must learn to trust the organization. While this prospect can be terrifying to some leaders with their fixation on control and predictability, it is an essential ingredient to building organizational capacity for change.
Trusting others is absolutely necessary if you wish to be trusted! Some people forget this.
 Judge (1999). The leader’s shadow: Exploring and developing executive character. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
 McCall, Lombardo, & Morrison (1988). Lessons of experience: How executives develop on the job. New York, NY: Free Press.
 Tichy and Cohen (1997). The leadership engine. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
 Goldsmith and Morgan (2003). Leadership is a contact sport: The “follow-up factor” in management development. Retrieved on July 10, 2010 fromhttp://www.marshallgoldsmithlibrary.com/docs/articles/LeaderContactSport.pdf
 Kotter and Cohen (2002). The heart of change: Real-life stories of how people change their organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
 Becerra and Gupta (1999). Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organization Science, 14, 32–44.
 Drickhamer (2004). Talking the walk. Industry Week, 253(9), 76.
 Covey (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people. New York, NY: Free Press.
 Kouzes (2005). Leadership development is character development.Leadership Excellence, 22(2), 6–7.
 Stamato (2008), p. 1. Should business leaders apologize? Why, when, and how an apology matters. Ivey Business Journal, 72(4), 1–8.
 Goffee and Jones (2000). Why should anyone be led by you? Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 63–70.
 Chawla and Kelloway (2004). Predicting openness and commitment to change. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 25(5/6), 485–502.
Log in to save your progress and obtain a certificate in Alison’s free Diploma in Change Management online course
Sign up to save your progress and obtain a certificate in Alison’s free Diploma in Change Management online course
Please enter you email address and we will mail you a link to reset your password.