Now that we have a little bit of a review of oxidation and
reduction under our belts, let's see if we can apply what
we now, maybe, re-understand to cellular respiration.
So cellular respiration, for every mole of a glucose,
C6H12O6, we combine that-- and maybe that's
in an aqueous state.
It's dissolved in water.
We combine that with six moles of molecular oxygen.
And then our cells perform cellular respiration in a
whole series of steps.
And I'll do more videos on that.
I'll just abbreviate it.
And then we end up with six moles of carbon dioxide.
We have to breathe this oxygen in order to perform cellular
respiration and we have to breathe this carbon dioxide
out because it's just a byproduct of cellular
Six moles of carbon dioxide, six moles of water.
And the whole point of cellular respiration is, plus
some energy is generated by this reaction.
And our bodies store this energy.
Well, some of it is just turned into heat.
But the whole point of cellular respiration is to
store it as 38 ATPs, which we've learned already is the
energy currency of biological systems.
And then our bodies, or biological systems in general,
can use these ATPs to contract muscles or generate nerve
impulses or grow cells or divide cells or whatever else
that a biological system has to do.
In the last video we learned a little bit about oxidation and
reduction, so let's apply those ideas here.
Now we saw in the last video that a chemist would say-- let
me write it this way-- a chemist would say that
oxidation means losing electrons, or not being able
to hog them.
While a chemist will tell you that
reduction is gaining electrons.
And if you have trouble remembering, oxidation is
losing, that's kind of OIL, that's the mnemonic.
Oxygen is losing electrons.
Reduction is gaining.
So OIL RIG.
This is what you learned in chemistry class.
Now biologists or biochemists will say, oh, well, you know I
like to define it a little bit differently.
A biologist will say that oxidation is losing hydrogen
atoms. And they'll say reduction is gaining hydrogen
atoms. And we saw in the last video that this definition is
actually hard when you're applying it to hydrogen
because it's not like a hydrogen atom can lose itself
or gain itself.
And the reason why we said that these two ideas are
consistent is because if I'm talking about a carbon and a
carbon is losing a hydrogen.
So let's say I have some compound that looks like this.
Maybe it's connected to a bunch of other things
And then later on the carbon-- let's say I have a carbon that
looks like that and I have an oxygen that's maybe bound to
I'm doing a very kind of hand-wavy explanation here.
And maybe that oxygen is bonded to something else.
This is what I start off with.
And on the other side of this equation I end up with
something that looks like this.
Where a carbon is bonded to an oxygen.
And maybe that other oxygen is bonded to this hydrogen.
The biologist will say, oh, this carbon has been oxidized
because it lost its hydrogen.
The hydrogen went from here-- I'll do it in a different
color-- went from this carbon to this oxygen.
And the biologist would also say that this
oxygen has been reduced.
It's been reduced because it gained hydrogens.
But the reality, or maybe the chemists' definition, which I
like a little bit more is, over here because carbon is
more electronegative, we see carbon is much more
electronegative than hydrogen.
And oxygen is even more electronegative than carbon.
When any of these guys bond with hydrogen they're going to
hog the electron.
So here, carbon got to hog the electron.
So here, carbon hogs electrons.
While here, carbon gets its electrons hogged by oxygen.
So here, oxygen hogs.
So by losing the hydrogen, the carbon actually lost its
opportunity to hog electrons.
And since it ended up bonding with an oxygen, it not only
can't hog hydrogen's electrons but then it gets its electrons
hogged by an even more electronegative atom.
So that's why these two definitions are consistent.
Same thing with the oxygen.
Here it's bonding with another oxygen, not hogging anything.
But when it gains the hydrogen it's able to
hog hydrogen's electrons.
Because it's so much more electronegative.
Or you could say that it's gaining electrons.
So that's why these two definitions are somewhat
Although sometimes they fall apart if we're not dealing
The chemistry definition applies more consistently to
But sometimes the biologists' definition is easier to kind
of glance at.
Or you'll actually see it written in textbooks.
So let's go back to cellular respiration and try to figure
out what's being oxidized and reduced.
So if we look over here.
Over here we have our glucose.
And actually I copied and pasted from Wikipedia a
And actually there's one error here.
And maybe I should edit it on Wikipedia.
There should be another hydrogen bonded to that carbon
But as you see, all of the hydrogens, they're either
bonded to an oxygen or a carbon over here.
On the left-hand side, they're either bonded to
an oxygen or a carbon.
If we were to write its oxidation state, in every case
it's bonded to something that's more electronegative.
So it's going to be giving up its electrons.
So it will have a plus one oxidation state.
And oxygen, in every case, is either bonded to
a carbon or a hydrogen.
And so, oxygen, if it's bonded to a carbon or a hydrogen, is
going to hog an electron from either one of those guys.
So in every situation in glucose, oxygen has a two
minus or a minus two oxidation state.
And carbon, since this whole thing is neutral, one would
think that carbon would have a neutral oxidation state.
And if you go through this, you actually find that most of
these carbons do have neutral oxidation states.
Let me circle a few.
So for example, this carbon right here, it's hogging an
electron from this hydrogen.
But then it gets an electron hogged by this oxygen.
And then of course it does nothing with the carbon.
So that's neutral.
This is neutral for the same reason.
This is neutral for the same reason.
This one is also neutral for the same reason.
It's bonded with two carbons.
It has an electron hogged by oxygen.
But then it hogs an electron from hydrogen.
So it's neutral.
So four of these carbons are neutral.
This carbon right here has two electrons hogged by oxygens.
And then it gets to take one back from the hydrogen.
So it has a plus one oxidation state.
This one is the opposite.
It has two hydrogens that it hogs from.
Then it has to give one away to the oxygen.
So this has a minus one.
So these two cancel out.
On average, you can say that the carbons in glucose have a
neutral oxidation state.
And I'm dealing with the chemist definition.
And I'm going to show you that they're essentially
Here all of the oxygens have no oxidation state.
Because they're just bonded.
Let me do it in a better color.
No oxidation state or neutral oxidation state because
they're double bonded with oxygen.
No one's hogging from anyone.
They're obviously equally electronegative.
If we look at the products, carbon
dioxide looks like this.
So, in either of these cases, oxygen is hogging two
electrons from this carbon.
So it has a minus two oxygen state.
This oxygen is hogging two electrons from carbon.
So it has a minus two oxidation state.
And this carbon is getting all of its valence electrons, all
four, hogged by the oxygen.
So it has a plus four oxidation state.
It's lost four electrons, you can imagine.
Because it's getting hogged.
So that's carbon.
So we could write this as four plus for the carbon.
And then each oxygen has a two minus.
And we can do the math later on to figure out
what the total is.
And then, if we look at the water-- we've looked at this
before-- the oxygen is hogging two electrons,
one from each hydrogen.
So two minus.
And then each of the hydrogens have a plus
one oxidation state.
So if you want to do a half reaction for cellular
respiration, and in the chemists' sense of things,
just dealing with electrons, you can immediately say, I
start with 12 hydrogens on this side.
Let me just write it this way.
So H12 on this side.
They all have a plus one oxidation state.
And then cellular respiration occurs.
And now I have 12 hydrogens.
I could write the 12 a little bit differently here.
But they still have a plus one.
Each of them still has a plus one oxidation state.
So nothing from an oxidation reduction point of view
happens to the hydrogen.
Now if we do the carbon.
On the left-hand side of the equation, we have six carbons.
They have a neutral oxidation state.
But then on the right-hand side of the
equation, what happens?
I now have six carbons.
Written a little bit differently.
But I have six carbons.
And they each have a plus four oxidation state.
Which means that they have lost four electrons.
Or their hypothetical charge, by losing those four
electrons, has gone up by four.
Because they're losing negatively charged electrons.
So the six carbons, after cellular respiration, end up
with six oxidized carbons, with plus
four oxidation states.
Plus-- so each of these lost four electrons.
We have six of them.
4 times 6 is 24 electrons.
These are the electrons that the carbon lost. So we see in
cellular respiration that the carbon is oxidized.
Oxidation is losing electrons.
We see in cellular respiration, we draw the half
reaction, carbon is losing, the six carbons are losing a
collective 24 electrons.
And then finally, if I were to do the oxygen on this side.
I've lost my equation up here.
So over here I have two oxygens.
And I'm going to draw them a little bit separate.
So I have these six oxygens here that have a minus two
On the left-hand side.
So I'll draw it like this.
They have a minus two oxidation state.
And then I have these 12 oxygens that
are completely neutral.
So I won't even write an oxidation state or oxidation
And then after we perform cellular
respiration, what happens?
Well now I have, in the carbon dioxide, I have 12 carbons
that have a minus two oxidation state.
Six times O2.
So let me write that down from the carbon dioxide.
So I have six O2s that all have a to
minus oxidation state.
And then I have another six oxygens that have a minus two
So plus six oxygens that have a minus two oxidation state.
So if you think about it, over here I had a collective
oxidation state on all of the oxygens.
These were neutral.
I have 6 times minus 2, that's a minus 12.
You can kind of view it as collective charge
of all six of them.
6 times minus 2.
Here I have 6 times minus 2, which is minus 12.
And then I have 6 times 2 oxygens per molecule.
So that's 12 times minus 2.
That's minus 24.
So to go from a minus 12 to a total oxidation or kind of
hypothetical charge of minus 36, I must
have gained 24 electrons.
And those 24 electrons that I gained, that the oxygens
gained, are the same 24 electrons that the carbons
lost. So from the chemistry point of
view, it's very clear.
Carbon was oxidized.
And oxygen, which gained electrons-- RIG.
Reduction is gaining.
Oxygen is reduced.
And this is all a bit of review.
But it's nice to see it in the context of cellular
And this actually kind of answers one of the questions
of where does this energy come from?
In any of these chemical reactions, when you see energy
being produced, it's because electrons are going from a
higher energy state to a lower energy state.
If I have an electron that's up here in a high energy state
and it is able to go to a more comfortable state, lower
orbital or lower energy orbital.
So low energy or more stable energy state.
It'll generate energy in the form of heat, or maybe this
can do some work in some way, help make ATP molecules.
And so when you see these half reactions, you see these 24
electrons, that are being lost by carbon,
carbon is being oxidized.
And they're going to oxygen.
They're going in a whole series of steps.
It's not just happening in one huge explosion.
It's happening over a huge series of steps.
And as it does that, it's entering lower and lower
And as these electrons enter the lower energy states,
essentially by going from the carbons and being pushed to
the oxygens, that's where the energy is coming from.
That's where the energy to make the 38
ATPs is coming from.
So, so far we talked a little bit about how a
chemist views oxidation.
I touched at the beginning of the video of how a biologist
And then we saw that cellular respiration from a chemist's
point of view is clearly showing that the carbon is
It's losing electrons.
And that the oxygen is being reduced.
It's gaining electrons.
It's being reduced.
That electrons are going from this carbon and they're going,
essentially, to these oxygens right here.
Now how does the biology definition of our
position hold up?
Well here it holds up pretty well.
Because you can imagine, over here, all of the hydrogens in
the equation are associated with glucose.
And so they're either bonded, if you look at the structure
The hydrogens are either bonded to carbons or oxygens.
So these are bonded to carbons and oxygens.
And when you go on the right-hand side of the
equation, all of the hydrogens are only bonding with oxygen.
So net-net, carbon definitely lost hydrogens.
And hydrogens and oxygen definitely gained hydrogens.
Let me write that down.
We see in respiration, carbon lost hydrogens.
And oxygen gained hydrogens.
And that's consistent.
Because we see that by losing hydrogens we are being
oxidized from a biologist point of view.
And by gaining hydrogens, oxygen is being reduced.
And just so you can kind of makes sense of this when you
see this-- and when I start drawing out the mechanisms,
which I will hopefully not make too hairy-- this process
of transferring these hydrogens is facilitated by
molecules like NAD plus and FAD.
And we'll see that.
But really, if we just want to reconcile the two notions, as
the hydrogens are being transferred from one
electronegative atom to another electronegative atom,
what's really being transferred is the opportunity
to hog electrons.
If carbon has the hydrogen, it gets to hog the electrons.
But if that hydrogen goes from the carbon-- and the whole
atom; not just the nucleus, but the whole atom goes to the
oxygen-- now the oxygen has gained that
electron that it can hog.
And carbon has lost the electron.
So carbon has oxidized and oxygen has been reduced.
And I mentioned this in previous videos.
But probably the most confusing thing about
oxidation is that you always want to say, all right, that
must have something to do with oxygen.
And it does.
The word really comes from, what would
oxygen do to something?
So oxygen, when it bonds with things, it loses, it takes
away their electrons.
Or, in a reaction, it'll often take away the hydrogens.
It took away the hydrogens from the
carbon in this situation.
So that's where the term oxidation comes from.
But you don't have to have oxygen anywhere in your
reaction for oxidation or reduction to occur.
Anyway, hopefully you found that reasonably useful.
This was actually a huge pain point for me when I learned, I
got comfortable with the chemistry definition of
And then all of a sudden you open up your biology book and
they start talking about losing and gaining hydrogens,
as opposed to electrons, and it took me a while to really
reconcile these two notions.