Conjunto de recordatorio
Conjunto de recordatorio
Conjunto de recordatorio
Conjunto de recordatorio
Conjunto de recordatorio
Conjunto de recordatorio
Conjunto de recordatorio
Twentieth Century Fiction
Prof. Avishek Parui
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Lecture – 08
Heart of Darkness – Part 3
So, hello and welcome to this NPTEL course entitled the Twentieth Century Fiction where we are looking at Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. So, we have already started with this text, and I believe you had couple of lectures in this text already. So, we just dive into the text and just continue from where we left off because if you remember the final point in which we ended last lecture. We talked about the quality of Marlow's narrative which was described by the you know omniscient narrator, the narrator outside the frame as something which the narrative contains a meaning not in the center, but on it is periphery right.
So, there is a center less quality about Marlow's narrative which has been emphasized already. And now we will just move on to this next section which is important for us to for the purpose of this course, and this should be on your screen where the comparison with the Buddha is very directly made. And we saw already the beginning in the very introduction of Marlow, the way he is introduced into the text there was this image of an idol god, a tired god, an exhausted god if you will with which Marlow was equated and then you know described.
But now the Buddha image comes in quite clearly and quite directly, but of course the entire epiphany, the entire enlightenment, that Marlow embodies over here is one of darkness not of illumination, but the irony is the only knowledge available the only illumination available, the only epiphany of wisdom available is that of darkness and so only true knowledge in this particular cultural political setting is that of darkness. It could be a darkness of horror of guilt of exploitation or the knowledge of exploitation that imperialism represents etcetera. So, you know this is what the novel is about.
And as I mentioned in the previous lecture it is a bit erroneous to look at Heart of Darkness as a critique of imperialism, it’s not really critique of imperialism, it is not really criticizing, it is not really saying imperialism should be done away with, because remember Conrad was a conservative writer, and he was very much in a conservative tradition of writing. But instead of a straight and direct critique of imperialism, what Heart of Darkness represents or offers us is an ambivalent attitude about imperialism. This ambivalence about imperialism is what is important for us to understand.
And there are politically incorrect qualities about Heart of Darkness you know it is in present day standards, it is quite racist in terms of the narrative, there is no non-white voices that we get to hear in Heart of Darkness, but it is precisely because of its you know politically incorrect quality that is so relevant today, it is not trying to be politically correct at all. It is a novel about confusion, about cognitive confusion, about political confusion about cultural confusion.
So, the Buddha image that we are about to see over here is embedded with irony I mean it is not an image which is one of straightforward enlightenment or wisdom or clarity of thought, or clarity of knowledge etcetera. It is rather a knowledge embodiment of confusion because only knowledge available as I mentioned is one of darkness and confusion ok.
So, now we see the image quite clearly describe to us. A mind, he began again, and this should be on your screen. Mind, he began again, this is Marlow, lifting one arm from the elbow, the palm of the hand outwards, so that, with his legs folded before him, he had the pose of the Buddha preaching in European clothes and without a lotus-flower. So, again this very curious juxtaposition of Buddha in European clothes and without a lotusflower, it is part of the entanglement is part of the confusing and confused entanglement that Marlow embodies.
Mind, none of us would feel exactly like this. What saves us is efficiency – the devotion to efficiency. But these chaps were not much account, so these chaps were not much account, really. They are not colonialist; their administration was merely a squeeze, and nothing more, I suspect. They were conquerors, and for that you want only brute force – nothing to boast of, when you have it, since your strength is just an accident arising from the weakness of others. This particular phrase is very important.
Twentieth Century Fiction
Prof. Avishek Parui
Department of Humanities and Social Science
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Lecture – 07
Heart of Darkness – Part 2
So, hello and welcome to this NPTEL course entitled Twentieth Century Fiction. We are reading Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness. So, in the very first lecture on this particular text we talked about the cultural background, the political background of this text out of which this novel emerges and we sort of discussed Conrad's location apropos of Imperialism and how this novel if it does not deconstruct, at least it problematizes some of the commonly assumed notions about imperialism at that time. And we also seen we also discussed how you know despite his political incorrectness or perhaps because its political incorrectness, this particular novel or novella you know is still relevant to the world.
We exist in the world exist today you know because of its political incorrectness, because of its very problematic entanglement between a certain political presupposition and the problem with that presupposition because in that in one sense Heart of Darkness isn’t really decrying imperialism. It is not really saying imperialism was a bad thing, it is not really saying imperialism should not have happened at all, it is not that radical that in that sense it is very much a conservative novel. It does belong to a conservative tradition of novel writing, but unlike the novels of Kipling for instance and unlike the novels of Rider Haggard at that point of time it does not really glamorize imperialism, does not really glorify imperialism at all. It just depicts to you the discomfort about imperialism that happens to man.
And of course the entire you know the entire enigma, the entire existential crisis, the entire psychological situation in the novel it all is all from a white man’s lens in that since it is very racially inflected, no non-white person speaks in this novel. So, the entire narrative is depicted and delivered and dished out by a white man through a white imagination, but despite that the discomfort of imperialism is something which this novel dramatizes quite interestingly and that’s the reason why it is a very relevant novel for us today especially given the current geopolitical situations that we encounter in a world we live in today.
So, in this lecture we will dive into the text we will start with the main text, we are going to see the opening of Heart of Darkness is interesting because like most great novels opening sets a tone for what is to follow and also it just little characterizes the narrator to a certain extent and we talked about how there are different kinds of narrators Heart of Darkness. There is one unnamed narrator someone who lives outside the narrative frame this almost 3rd person narrator and then we have the inset narrator Marlow the one who tells the real story about going to Congo and he is unreliable, he is nervous, he is decadent, he is failing in his narrative and he is the one that is really interesting. He is a character narrative.
So, he is someone he is someone who actually experienced what he is telling about, what he is talking about now and in one sense Heart of Darkness is basically an anti-novel. It is about the failure of you know putting an experience into a narrative. It is about a
failure of narrativization in which sense in that sense it becomes a very experimental novel. It is a successful novel about the failure of narrativization. So, in that sense it’s one of the early postmodern novels. If you want to consider that way, it does definitely have an unreliable narrator, it does definitely have someone who is nervous, someone who is not reliable, someone who is not omnipresent, someone who has no knowledge whatsoever, but even in retrospect of what happened right.
So, that in that sense the narrator character in Heart of Darkness is a postmodern narrator character. It is not a trickster character, he is not tricking you, he is not leading you down the garden path deliberately, but he himself does not quite know what had happened. So, he is struggling to tell you the story and that struggle to tell the story is something which Heart of Darkness dramatizes quite movingly quite compellingly you know in my mind ok. So, in that note let us look at the novel, let us look at how the novel begins. It’s set in London, it’s set in Thames in London, the river in London and the entire story takes place from that boat, there is a boat called Nellie in which you know the narrative begins.
So, and they are all sailing about 4 or 5 people over here they are all sailing in the Thames in a river in a in a boat called Nellie and in that setting, Marlow the narrator character he starts telling the story about what happened to him when he went to Congo. So, interestingly the two rivers are interesting contrasts of each other. One is the river of civilization quote unquote, the hype or the high tide of imperialism and the other river Congo is the other river like literally the other river is the alterity of the civilization. It is a non-civilized river, but essentially that is the river which feeds Thames which feeds Thames in terms of the mercantile commerce in the mercantile economy, but also the economy of civilization.
So, entire civilization as seen in London over here, it is dependent on what comes in from the Congo in that sense. So, there is a sense of shame and guilt about that as well in Heart of Darkness. So, the two rivers are very interestingly juxtaposed with each other, very increasingly contrasted with each other and if we remember we just finished Rabindranath Tagore's short story The Postmaster and even there we found that how natural signifiers natural markers are reflective of psychological situatedness.
So, we had for instance if you remember the end of the story when the postmaster’s coming back from the village back to Calcutta, sailing back to Calcutta everything around him seems to cry, everything around him seems to mourn the departure that he is doing from the other character Ratan and you know nature seems to be weeping it’s swelling river, it is monsoon coming in, everything seems to be you know sad you know on the brink of sadness.
So, swelling were sadness. So, we saw there again how natural signifiers natural markers are reflective of emotional situations and we have similar settings here in Heart of Darkness as well. So, take a look at the opening of Heart of Darkness. This should be on your screen now the Nellie a cruising yawl swung to her anchor without a flutter of the sails and was at rest the flood had made the wind was nearly calm and being bound down by the river. The only thing for it was to come to and wait for the turn of the tide. So, it begins with the image of stillness. We have Nellie, a cruising yawl, a boat like thing where the characters are floating on river Thames and we had seen, we are told that a flood had been made, the wind was calm and now it is just waiting for the turn of the tide really.
So, it is a moment of stillness between two tides. So, the very opening we have several conceptual things coming in. So, first of all the concept of fluidity is important over here that the Nellie the river the boat Nellie is flowing in the little river Thames. So, the sense of fluidity is very palpable that sense of liminality between two conditions between two tides stillness between two tides that has been captured here as well. So, we have these two categories at the very onset at the very outset of the novel dramatized and depicted to us the sea reach of the Thames stretched before us like the beginning of an interminable waterway.
So, again the interminable, the endlessness of the waterway it is part of fluidity, the fluidity of imagination, the fluidity of human consciousness and you know most of us who are even tangentially aware of modernism and modernist literature, this is very much the beginning of high modernism. We must have come by a term called stream of consciousness, right. It is a technique it was a term used by William James the brother of Henry James. William James is a philosopher, a psychologist philosopher, philosopher of the mind. He is increasingly relevant in the studies of Neuroscience today. So, just before I came to this lecture, I was looking at an interview by Ian McEwan who was talking about his new novel The Nutshell and there he is the novel is about an embryo in a woman's womb. The character is actually an embryo or the narrator is actually an embryo someone the child who is not yet born.
So, while talking about that novel McEwan describes, and alludes to Henry James. An entire idea of Henry James that every emotional movement in the mind it has a physical manifestation. In other words emotions and physicality are interlinked with each other intimately connected to each other so emotions are not really something in there. Emotions are very physical, there is a viscerality about emotions which is something that Henry James theorized and what modern neuroscience corroborates. So, there is a bit of a digression, but I think it is helpful in that sense because what we see over here is an example of stream of consciousness. It is called literally a stream of consciousness.
So, they are actually in the stream an endless fluid stream of the river Thames, but it also unfolds into a stream of consciousness. So, again we see how the landscape and the mindscape are dialogic with each other in a very complex cognitive way. So, the interminable waterway quite literally becomes a stream of consciousness here in this novel the very outset of Heart of Darkness. In the offing the sea and sky were welded together without a joint. So, again look at the endlessness of nature around the sea and sky are welded together without a joint.
And in the luminous space the tanned sails to the barges drifting up with a chart with a tide seem to stand in red clusters seem to stand still in red clusters of canvas sharply peaked with gleams of varnish spritz.
So, again the whole idea of stillness and liminality and fluidity and endlessness, we have all these things coming in a very. They are also smuggled in as it were using natural material signifiers material markers. A haze rested on the low shores, that ran out to sea in rusting flatness in vanishing flatness, sorry the air was above the air was dark above Gravesend and further back still seemed condensed into a mournful gloom brooding motionless over the biggest and the greatest town on earth. So, you know this is a description of London as you can see the biggest and greatest town on earth, but we see very quickly how the bigness and greatness of London are actually greatly dependent on the darkness which is imperialism.
And you know it is Congo feeding Thames that is what happens inn Heart of Darkness and we saw and this is what mentioned already in my opening lecture on Heart of Darkness we see that the Heart of Darkness is not really out there in Africa, it is not really out there in a Congo it is actually in there in here in a site of civilization is also actually the Heart of Darkness, right. So, the biggest greatest town on earth it has a tone has a tone of irony to it has a ring of irony to it which gets more accentuated as we move on in this novel. So, at this moment we have the experience of London over here. You know the whole idea of Thames, the whole idea of endlessness of Thames which is just blending onto the sky which is potentially endless and then there is a mournful gloom brooding motionless of the biggest and the greatest town on earth.
So, we see this one little line over here that should say a lot of things. So, in one hand we have the positive markers or markers of positivity biggest greatest on earth. You know we have all tese positive lovely epithets biggest greatest town, but we also see how the biggest greatest town is surrounded and pervaded or blanketed in a way by a mournful gloom brooding motionless. So, we have this decadence coming over the biggest greatest on earth and therein lies the complexity about imperialism in Heart of Darkness and in one hand there is a celebration of imperialism.
This very conservative sanctioning of imperialism by Conrad who was essentially a conservative writer and acknowledging London as a biggest greatest town on the earth, but also we see how the biggest greatest town on earth also contains a very mournful gloom, the blanket of mournfulness a blanket of bleakness as it were which is part of the biggest and greatest package.
So, we have this ambivalence which is coming in and that is the a very important word in Heart of Darkness - ambivalence which literally means I mean sometimes we talk about ambivalence as confusion, we talk about ambivalence as synonymous with confusion, but actually there is bit of a difference between ambivalence and confusion. I mean ambivalence is ability to contain two valences together at any given point of time. So, ambi is two valence is values. So both values existing simultaneously. They are to situate simultaneously that is what ambivalence essentially means.
So, there is an ambivalent attitude towards imperialism which we see now in the Heart of Darkness and we see how that ambivalence is. Sort of communicated to us using very natural signifiers and just like we saw Tagore use similar signifiers while actually talking about the human mind and human emotions in the short story Postmaster which we finished before we began this ok.
So, now we have the description of characters here and there and we will just move on a bit. Now if we come to this bit of the novel where we should be on your screen where the character is describing Marlow and the physical description of Marlow is important where he is a storyteller in Heart of Darkness and he becomes a decadent sad storyteller, the inadequate storyteller.
So, to say and that is what Marlow is in Heart of Darkness and how does he first appear in a novel is an important image ok. Marlow sat cross legged right aft, leaning against the mizzen mast. He had sunken cheeks, a yellow complexion, a straight back an ascetic aspect and with his arms dropped the palms of hands outward resembled an idol, ok. So, the whole idea of idol, the very sad prophet, very sad god something sad godlike about Marlow. So, he had sunken cheeks. So, you know we see immediately he embodies decadence, he embodies a sense of enervation, exhaustion, he had sunken cheeks, a yellow complexion. So, again the paleness, jaundiced complexion is something which is you know very immediately visible in Marlow straight back in ascetic aspect. It is not really an earthly man; it is not really someone who was supposedly with a family.
So, there is something there is something ascetic, something detached about him from earthly activities. With his arms dropped, the palms of hands outwards resembled an idol. So, again though what idol is important and we will come back to it later and find towards the end of the novel, Marlow is compared to Buddha. So he has enlightenment, but then of course the whole irony in that statement is his enlightenment is not one of positivity, is not one of brightness, is not one of illumination. His enlightenment is actually one of darkness. So, the only enlightenment available to Marlow, the only enlightenment available to him is one of darkness and knowledge is one of darkness is not one of illuminations is not one of vastness or bigness.
So the only enlightenment, the only truth available to Marlow, the only true embodiment of Marlow through his prophetic and godlike quality is that of darkness. And now we are told that we felt meditative and fit for nothing, but placid staring. So, again the whole idea of still staring is important. There is a degree of meditativeness meditative quality over here which is important. We fell meditative and fit for nothing, but placid staring the day was ending in a serenity of still and exquisite brilliance. So, again ambivalence serenity of still and exquisite brilliance right. So, there is this degree of decadence the day was ending.
So, the twilight quality is important. Twilight is literally the threshold quality between day and night. The threshold time a temporal marker between day and night that is what twilight is and we have a similar kind of setting over here. The water is shown, specifically the sky without a speck was a benign immensity of unstained light, a very mist from the Essex marsh was like a gauzy and radiant fabric hung from the wooded rises inland.
And draping the low shores in diaphanous folds. Ony the gloom to the west brooding over the upper reaches became more sombre every minute as if angered by the approach of the sun. So, again we see how the ambivalence is situated and dramatized over here.
So, on the one hand a positivity benign immensity you know completely untouched, illumination radiant, fabric etcetera as all these phrases are important markers of positivity, but then we also have the gloom of the west brooding over the upper reaches becoming became more sombre every minute. So, the sombre quality, the brooding quality or the gloom like quality that becomes very interestingly juxtaposed and entangled with any markers of positivity and radiance we saw just in a sentence before.
So, we have this ambivalence coming in and dramatized very interestingly over here. And at last in its curved and imperceptible fold, the sun sank low and from glowing white changed to a dull red without rays, without heat as if about to go out suddenly stricken to death, by the touch of the gloom brooding.
So, we have again the sense of dead, the image of death coming and the sun setting and it is very symbolic if you remember if you pay attention to what is actually being told to us and between the lines and is open to interpretation as well, the very image of the sun setting you know it becomes obviously a natural phenomenon, a cosmic phenomenon if you will, but also it is a very symbolic political phenomenon because you know the image of the sun was very stereotypically used with the entire narrative of the British empire as you know and a very popular pompous and arrogant saying the sun never sets on the British empire, it’s just an endless empire an endless stretch of geopolitical glory and which was described which is allegorize in a way by the non-setting sun, but over here we have the image of the setting sun. The sun is actually setting and that became that that becomes very quickly and symbolically an image of the empire coming to an end an image of the empire exhausting itself out, right.
So, it almost becomes the thermodynamic image of exhaustion and we can connect it very quickly to the image of exhaustion and experience of exhaustion that is embodied by Marlow as we just seen you know very appearance of Marlow the first time he appears in the novel. He appears as someone who is elevated there is a god like quality about him. He is a sad tired god, a sad exhausted god right and that exhaustion and sadness becomes markers become markers of his embodiment throughout the novel along with nervousness and a sense of a traumatic reawakening which he embodies all the time.
Now the image of the setting sun is important and you know we should pay some attention to it as a very symbolic image the setting sun which is obviously telling you something about the empire about the entire consumption of the glorious empire you know the commonly consumed idea of the empire as a glorious endless enterprise.
But that is coming to an end that is actually symbolically being challenged and subverted and sort of undercut to a certain extent by the image of the setting sun and of course, the gloom brooding right.
And then immediately we are given a change. Again it is important to understand how the natural markers of change basically corresponding with the markers in the mind Forthwith, forthwith a change came over the waters and the serenity became less brilliant, but more profound. So, then look at this shift from brilliant to profound. Profound obviously over here it is suggestive of a degree of sombre like quality, the old river in its broad reach rested unruffled at the decline of day. The word decline is important. The decline of day after ages of good service done to the race that peopled its banks spread out in its tranquil dignity of a waterway leading to the uttermost ends of the earth.
So, we have now very clear images of exhaustion and termination coming in. So, that degree of termination or the terminator like quality is important over here at the end of the earth. So, it is almost like the river is coming to an end and which is contrasted with the endlessness with vision with which the novel began, really and you know we are also told that the decline of the day. Again a very important phrase decline of the day is also a decline of the river. I mean the river had served many men, has done a great service to a race of people, that peopled its banks through different points of time, but now it is coming to an exhausting end and the sense of exhaustion and ending is something which keeps coming back is like a recursive marker in this narrative over here. We looked at the venerable stream not in the vivid flush of the short day that comes and departs forever.
But in the August light of abiding memories the August light of abiding memory is important over here. What is this August light of abiding memories and that is quite literally a stream of consciousness, that is quite literally the state of mind and you know what we see in Heart of Darkness is how the mind and the landscape, the mindscape of the landscape that ceases to be different categories at different points of time they sort of blend with each other and oftentimes what is described as natural signifiers are actually being used to talk about the mind, talk about the mood, to talk about emotional situatedness of the character at that point of time and indeed nothing is easier for a man who has, as the phrase goes followed the sea with reverence and affection that to evoke the great spirit of the past upon the lower reaches of the Thames.
So, again the whole idea following the sea being and a follow a fluidity or someone who has spent an entire lifetime being fluid and liminal and now you know the whole idea of looking at the river Thames becomes, it’s like a Deja vu of your life it’s like a retelling of what you experience of life as a sea man, the tidal currents runs to and fro in an unceasing service in its unceasing service crowded with memories of men and ships it had borne to the rest of home or to the battles of the sea. So, again we have the river Thames over here it becomes like a it ceases to be a natural physical river, it actually becomes a stream of consciousness which contains the endlessness of historical time, right.
So, there is a different kind of human historical time and very soon we have markers of human history coming in the different people, the different figures mentioned are historical figures over here and they become markers of certain kind of civilizations that certain activity which the Thames has witnessed over periods of time. Look at the markers, look at the figures mentioned or alluded to in this particular section, ok. It had known and served all the men of whom the nation is proud from Sir Francis Drake to Sir John Franklin Knights, all titled and untitled the great knights errant of the sea. So, two characters over here Francis Drake and Sir John Franklin the two mentioned characters over here again they are interesting characters because both of them are titled as knights Sir Francis Drake and Sir John Franklin, but we know Sir Francis Drake was also essentially a pirate.
So, the very thin border line, the very blurring border line between being a pirate and being a national hero is something which is alluded to over here because you know on one hand he looted other ships especially Spanish ships and Francis Drake at that time the sea was controlled by the English and Spanish armada and it was a great competition as you would know about controlling the sea. So, the Spanish also extended empire. They also expanded the empire in other directions and English in some other direction, but essentially those are the rival you know and of course the Dutch as well the Portuguese as well, but you know Francis Drake becomes a national hero for England because all the amount of money, amount of wealth he looted from other ships which is there was a reason why he was knighted in the first place.
So, again the very thin line between a shameful illegal activity of looting or being a pirate and that of national glory that of becoming a knight is depicted over here. With that image to that illusion to one figure Francis Drake the it was described as a great knights errant of the sea. It had borne all the ships whose names are like jewels flashing the night of time from the Golden Hind returning with her rotund flanks full of treasure to be visited by the Queen's highness and thus passed out of a gigantic tail to the Erebus and Terror bound on the other conquest that never returned.
So, again look at the liminality, look at the ambivalence over here.