Alison's New App is now available on iOS and Android! Download Now

    Study Reminders
    Support

    Hello. Today, we are going to look at one of the most important poets of the 20 th Century,
    Thomas Stearns Eliot. He was born in 1888 and died in 1965. We will first see the historical
    and literary context briefly and then look into the life of T S Eliot as it has a bearing on his
    poetry. Then, spend some time briefly on his own concept of poetry, poet and poetic theory
    and all that.
    Then, we will see the publication history of this poem, ‘The Waste Land’ and then, the
    Structure. Finally, we will read some passages from section 1 and section 2 of this Waste
    Land. And then, give an analysis of this poem and then continue with the third, f ourth and
    fifth sections in the next lecture.

    (Refer Slide Time: 01:16)

    Here is a Historical and Literary context. Of course, it was a transition to the new century in
    which Eliot was born. He saw the First World War and the Second World War with his own
    eyes. But the experience of the First World War is the one that has a bearing on his poems so
    much. What he noticed was inexplicable and avoidable massive deaths and destructions.
    It was no man’s understanding. How could so many people die at the same time? And also,
    we find another phenomenon at this time that is, many poets from US migrated to Europe,
    particularly, Paris and London. We also have this emergence of modernist poetry at this time
    with 3 poets, dominant poets like Yeats, Eliot and Pound.
    At this time, we noticed an influence of continental art movements like symbolism, futurism,
    cubism, surrealism and so on, on modern poetry. These are various art movements which
    attempted to capture reality very closely, carefully. All of them face the same question of
    meaning and values for humanity in personal and social lives. What was man? What was
    human being? What was the meaning?

    (Refer Slide Time: 02:41)

    As we said earlier, TS Eliot is one of the most influential poet-critics of the 20th century. He
    was a learned man like Milton that is why he was able to write so much about poetry and
    poets throughout his life. He was exposed to Unitarian and Catholic Church practices f rom
    his childhood, he was well-versed in both, Western and Eastern thought, not only literature,
    philosophy as well. He was influenced by Symbolism specifically by Laforgue at an early
    age.
    He was friends with Conrad Aiken in his Harvard days, where he studied and then , he
    became friends with Jean Verdenal in France and of course, with Pound in England. Eliot
    was traumatized by his failed marriage with his first wife Vivienne Haigh-wood. As a result,
    he joined Anglican Church and settled in the UK for whole of his life. Because of his
    personal problems, he suffered a mental breakdown in 1921, and wrote parts of the Waste
    Land while recovering in Switzerland. This poem is a significant poem for 20th century.

    (Refer Slide Time: 04:00)

    Let us see the poetic theory of TS Eliot as he has enunciated in his essay “Tradition and
    Individual Talent” published in 1919 which has had a tremendous influence on the writing
    and reading practices in literature. Tradition was very important for Eliot; equally objectivity
    was also important for him. He said that the poet should have a sense of the past and reflect
    the whole of European culture in his work.
    Similarly, he said that, the poet should be objective, he should not be like Wordsworth,
    expressing his own life, on the other hand, Eliot wanted poets to keep themselves away f rom
    the poem. He used his image of a catalyst, so, he said a poet is like a catalyst or a medium as
    he does not get involved in the poetic process personally. That is why he offered this
    impersonal theory of poetry. To quote Eliot from this essay, “poetry is not a turning loose of
    emotion, but an escape from emotion; it is not the expression of personality, but an escape
    from personality.” Readers after him have found that this theory was kind of mask used by
    him to express himself in different ways, that is why critics have discerned Eliot’s own
    personality in his poems, especially, in the Waste Land.

    (Refer Slide Time: 05:26)

    We have the pictures of Eliot with his first wife, Vivienne and then, his second wife, Valerie ,
    in the second picture, the larger picture. The small picture is with Vivienne and the larger
    picture is with Valerie. He was unhappy in the first marriage, whereas, in the second
    marriage, he was very happy. We can see the joy of Eliot and Valerie in the second picture.
    (Refer Slide Time: 05:51)

    These pictures are the cover pages of the first editions as published in United States and UK.
    Let us understand the context in which the Waste Land was written and also published. This
    was composed during a long period of time from 1910 to 1922 actually. Most of the parts of
    the poem were composed during the 1921 rest cure in Switzerland. This is a collection of
    fragments that is why it is called “a heap of broken images.” All kinds of images have been
    put together. This was ruthlessly edited by Pound and so, as gratitude, as a mark of gratitude,
    Eliot dedicated this poem to Pound. This publication shows the best collaboration between
    Eliot and Pound in publishing. This was published in The Criterion in the UK and The Dial in
    the US.
    These are the two important journals of those times. How can we imagine that a poem could
    get an award of 2000 Dollars in 1922 without being seen? That is what really happened. The
    Dial magazine in the US awarded him 2000 Dollars before publication and also later, af ter
    publication, they gave him 150 Dollars and from the book published in UK and US, he was
    able to get 580 Dollars and then he got some royalty from Hogarth Press as 20 Pounds and in
    all together, we have 2800 Dollars for TS Eliot out of this publication.
    There is a critique called Lawrence Rainey who has studied the economic implications of the
    publications of the Waste Land in the US and UK, considering the marketing
    commoditization of culture in modernist age. This is something very special because Eliot
    was not a very well-known writer at the time. This is how an unknown writer Eliot became an
    international celebrity in a short time.

    (Refer Slide Time: 08:08)

    Some more preliminary details about the poem let us learn here. The total length of the poem
    is 433 lines in 5 unequal sections. The original title as selected by Eliot was this, “He do the
    police in different voices,” actually, this is quotation from Joseph Conrad’s famous novel,
    Heart of Darkness. And the title now, as it appears is The Waste Land.
    Similarly, he also chose an epigraph from the same novel, Heart of Darkness. “The horror!
    The horror!” expressing the horror of humanity by Conrad in his novel, but then, Pound did
    not accept this, so, he dissuaded Eliot from using this. He told him to use something more
    valuable, that is why, then, Eliot chose this current epigraph we have in the poem.
    This epigraph deals with the death wish of the Cumaean Sybil from Petronius’s book
    Satyricon. The meaning of which is “I want to die.” The original author is of course, TS
    Eliot, but it was collaborated with Pound and so we have these collaborative authors between
    Eliot and Pound. Pound extensively edited this draft of more than 1000 lines into 433 lines.
    Not surprisingly, Eliot has dedicated this book to Ezra Pound and he calls Pound, ‘the better
    craftsman.’

    (Refer Slide Time: 09:43)

    The whole poem is organized into five sections like this: ‘The Burial of the Dead’ with 76
    lines dealing with the subject Earth and then, ‘A Game of Chess’ dealing with the element of
    Air in 96 lines. Next, we have ‘The Fire Sermon’ dealing with element Fire in 139 lines and
    then we have ‘Death by Water’ obviously dealing with Water and then lastly, we have ‘What
    the Thunder Said’ dealing with the Sky. So, these sections contribute to the making up of this
    Waste Land.
    (Refer Slide Time: 10:26)

    First, let us see some passages, we are not using the whole text, we have to go to Poetry
    Foundation of the textbook that we have in our course for getting the complete poem. We

    have some passages for just discussion and understanding. Let us read the first passage f rom
    the first section ‘The Burial of the Dead.’

    “April is the cruellest month, breeding
    Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
    Memory and desire, stirring
    Dull roots with the spring rain.
    Winter kept us warm, Covering 5
    Earth in forgetful snow, Feeding
    A little life with dried tubers.

    ...

    Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee
    With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade,
    And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten, 10
    And drank coffee, and talked for an hour.”

    We have underlined, we have highlighted certain words in colour like April is the cruellest
    month, referring to the allusion to Chaucer’s The Prologue, where Chaucer glorifies April.
    Here, in contrast, Eliot is revising the understanding of Spring and April month.
    We also have 3 seasons: April, winter and summer. That is why we have highlighted
    elements, seasons, human beings, the cycle of life, all are brought together in this poem and
    then we have identified this ‘as’ and ‘we,’ several kinds of pronouns will be used in this
    poem and the underlining of breeding, mixing, stirring, spring and all that will draw our
    attention to how the first line, we have the reduction in line length. Breeding, mixing,
    stirring, spring. Of course, rain is there, even if you remove that rain, you can see some kind
    of rhyme you can see, some kind of rhythm you can see and this rhyme and rhythm is

    reduction in meaning. Reduction in understanding life. Reduction in the kind of human lif e
    that we have come to in 20th century.
    (Refer Slide Time: 12:35)

    Second passage,

    “What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow
    Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, 20
    You cannot say, or guess, for you know only
    A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
    And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
    And the dry stone no sound of water. Only
    There is shadow under this red rock, 25
    (Come in under the shadow of this red rock,)
    And I will show you something different from either
    Your shadow at morning striding behind you
    Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;

    I will show you fear in a handful of dust.” 30
    This passage focuses on this show of shadow or shadow of show with a heap o f broken
    images in the religious context of the Son of Man, that is Christ and these rhetorical
    questions, what are the roots that clutch? What branches grow out of this stony rubbish?
    Nothing grows here. Nothing is renewable here, then, what is this life that is death?
    (Refer Slide Time: 13:40)

    We need to understand that the Waste Land is here, city-based poem. Modernist poets really
    focused on city life, unlike romantic poets who focused on rural life. So, here we have city,
    but this city is identified by Eliot and many other poets as unreal city.

    “Unreal city, 60
    Under the brown frog of winter dawn,
    A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,
    I had not thought death had undone so many.
    Sighs, short and infrequent, were exhaled,
    And each man fixed his eyes before his feet. 65
    Flowed up the hill and down King William Street,

    To where Saint Mary Woolnoth kept the hours
    With a dead sound on the final stroke of nine.
    There I saw one I knew, and stopped him, crying:
    “Stenson... 69
    “You, hypocrite lecteur! - mon semblable, - mon frère!”

    This means- you hypocrite readers, my likeness, my brother. This is the kind of foreign
    language expression that Eliot has used often throughout the poem causing difficulty for the
    reader.
    (Refer Slide Time: 14:56)

    Now, we move on to the second section. A Game of Chess. This game of chess has a
    symbolic meaning of this play of the game of life. How disruptively we play with each other,
    here, is one drama in the history of mankind. The Chair she sat in, like a burnished thron e,
    with an allusion to Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra.

    “The Chair she sat in, like a burnished throne,
    Glowed on the marble, where the glass
    Held up by standards wrought with fruited vines

    From which a golden Cupidon peeped out. 80
    (Another hid his eyes behind his wing)
    Doubled the flames of seven-branched candelabra
    Reflecting light upon the table as
    The glitter of her jewels rose to meet it,
    From satin cases poured in rich profusion; 85
    In vials of ivory and coloured glass,
    Unstoppered, lurked her strange synthetic perfumes,
    Unguent, powdered, or liquid- troubled, confused
    And drowned the sense in odours;”

    Cleopatra is evoked in this poem to indicate the kind of contrast we have with modern lif e,
    modern life does not have so much of meaning as Cleopatra could have, even when she was
    trying to live her life, when she knew her imminent death, problem of life that she was facing
    because she joined Antony and opposed Caesar. She was meaningful or she found meaning in
    her life.
    (Refer Slide Time: 16:30)

    Now, the Game of Chess continues. We have a contemporary situation now.
    “My nerves are bad tonight. Yes, bad. Stay with me.
    “Speak to me. Why do you never speak. Speak.
    What are you thinking of? What thinking? What?
    I never know what you are thinking. Think.”

    A voice replies,

    I think we are in rats’ alley,
    Where the deal men lost their bones.

    Then, another voice-

    “What is that noise?”

    the wind under the door.
    What is the noise now? What is the wind doing?
    Nothing again nothing. Do

    You know nothing? Do you see nothing? Do you remember
    Nothing?”

    This is the kind of life we have in 20th century, early 20th century. Probably, we have it now
    as well. Nothing echoing the great nothing in Shakespeare’s King Lear ‘Nothing can come
    out of nothing.’

    (Refer Slide Time: 17:30)

    Next section from A Game of Chess we have here. Another context, a pub, where people
    come and have their drinks and then it is time to leave and so we have many voices mixed up
    in this passage.

    “The chemist said it would be alright, but I’ve never been the same
    You are a proper fool, I said.
    Well, if Albert would not leave you alone, there it is, I said,
    What you get married for if you do not want children?
    HURRY UP, PLEASE ITS TIME.
    Well, that Sunday Albert was home, they had a hot gammon,

    And they asked me in to dinner, to get the beauty of it hot-
    HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME

    HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME.
    Goonight Bill. Goonight Lou. Goonight May. Goonight.
    Ta ta. Goonight Goonight.

    Good night, ladies, good night, sweet ladies, good night, good night.”
    This modern context of taking leave from the pub as the bartender is announcing, ‘hurry up
    please, it is time, leave the hall. Leave the bar. And we have 2 ladies speaking to each other
    about their marital problems. About, of course, husband and wife relationship. Albert is there
    and his wife is there and another lady is asking, ‘what you get married for, if you do not want
    children?’ That is the biggest question that we have in this poem. The Waste Land is Waste
    Land because it does not produce any offspring, in human life or in natural life.
    (Refer Slide Time: 19:02)

    After looking at all these passages, we have identified this kind of thematic contrast from the
    title to the lines that we saw at the end. The Waste Land immediately recalls a fertile land
    opposite to it. Then we have this death, with burial of the dead, so we have death and also
    life, cruelty and compassion, wisdom and ignorance, broken fragments and then whole object
    or whole subject. Then we have fear and hope as in the case of this husband and wif e, the
    nervous wife and the relaxed husband.
    We have unreal city and also real life or unreal life, we have hypocrisy and integrity. Past and
    present, dark and light, forget and remember, men and women, betrayal and loyalty. We saw
    Albert, if he would not find happiness in his wife, he would go to somebody else. So, this
    kind of betrayal in human relations; in personal life, in political life, in the whole of human
    life. That is why, this poem is very powerful.

    We have not mentioned some of the other passages in this, particularly, we must mention this
    Madame Sosostris passage, where she has a pack of cards to inform the people about their
    future, she is a fortune teller and she plays games with people’s lives. So, we have hypocrisy
    and integrity, we will have one line from this a little later.
    (Refer Slide Time: 20:34)

    We have a number of poetic devices in this poem. It is a modernist poem with a lot of
    symbols. The Waste Land is of course, the grand symbol we have in this poem, the Waste
    Land for people and civilization which does not have much meaning. We have the allusion in
    April is the cruellest month, breeding to Chaucer, we have transferred epithet in dull roots
    and forgetful snow. Rhetorical question, what are the roots that clutch? What branches grow?
    Nothing grows, it is a question. Then, we have alliteration and assonance in the same line that
    is why I have put them together like this, dry stone no sound of water, Only. ‘O’ sound
    represents this assonance and the ‘da’ sound represents this alliteration, when we have them
    together, there is some music, there is some rhythm in it. Dry stone no sound of water, Only.
    Then we have the irony, these are the lines that we have to remember in the case of Mad ame
    Sosostris.

    “Madame Sosostris, ...the wisest woman in Europe
    With a wicked pack of cards”

    She is considered to be the wisest woman but she has a wicked pack of cards, then what is the
    use of wisdom? Is there any ignorance? That is the question that we have to remember, that
    is why irony operates very powerfully in this poem. We have a rhetorical figure called
    Antistrophe, we have this example here, you will understand from the underlined words
    which are repeated at the end of the lines;

    “A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,
    I had not thought death had undone so many”

    When we have these repetitions at the end, this is antistrophe. When we have these
    repetitions at the beginning, we have Anaphora.
    Then we have one more allusion here, ‘I had not thought death had undone so many,’
    referring to the historical reality of deaths of so many people, millions and millions of people
    during the first World War and many wars fought in 20th century and many deaths happening
    during this Covid time. Perhaps, we will have another Waste Land poem out of this Covid 19
    now.
    (Refer Slide Time: 22:51)

    We have more number of poetic devices, one allusion is here, we referred to this earlier- “you
    hypocrite lecteur!, -mon semblable,- mon frère” This is a quotation from a French poet called
    Baudelaire. Meaning - you hypocrite reader, my likeness, my brother. We have, again,

    alliteration and assonance in one line; ‘another hid his eyes behind his wing.’ ‘Ha’ sound
    represents alliteration and ‘e’ sound actually, represents assonance.
    Then we have consonance in another line- unguent, powdered or liquid- troubled, confused.
    Then we have the sound at the end of the word- powdered, liquid, troubled, confused that is
    consonance in contrast to alliteration. We have imitating sounds called onomatopoeia through
    jug, jug and many other sounds, here, we have the example of ‘jug, jug,’ then we have
    metaphor and symbol; These are found throughout the poem, the major metaphor that we
    have in this is, a desert and rock, representing no meaning, no water, no life. We have a
    curious case of clipping- how words are reduced one after another. What are you thinking
    now? What thinking? What? I never know what you are thinking. Think. So, the number of
    words are progressively reduced, that is why we call it clipping.
    Then we have anaphora which is repeated at the beginning of the line- what shall I do?
    repeated several times, then we have a very important rhetorical question addressing the main
    theme of the poem- fertility and sterility. What you get married for, if you do not want
    children? In personal life, between a husband-wife, if they do not want to have children and
    have sex without the aim of procreation, what is the use of that? That is a big question that
    Eliot asks in this poem.
    (Refer Slide Time: 24:51)

    Let us pay some attention to rhyme, rhythm and meter. In this poem, we must remember that
    this poem was written in free verse, this is one of the best modernist poems breaking all
    traditional, conventional rules of writing poetry. So, we can say that this poem, in spite of

    being written in free verse, it has some rhyme and rhythm of its own through lot of repetitions
    of words, of images, tones, themes.
    However, we also notice some end and internal rhymes. Specifically, we notice feminine
    rhymes at the opening lines like breeding, mixing, stirring, covering, feeding, spring appears
    before rain in the line. Not in season. Rhythm refers to the speech pattern of the common
    people or upper-class people from kings and queens to this kind of fortune teller- Madame
    Sosostris, ordinary people, lower class people, all kinds of people are there. So, all these
    speech patterns are represented in The Waste Land. That is why we have this Duchess on the
    one hand and Cockney woman on the other hand. When we want to look at the meter, we can
    say that the meter of this poem is polymetrical, because there are many metrical variations.
    As you can see, as we said earlier, the number of syllables in each line is reduced
    progressively from first line to the fourth line. We have almost 10 syllables in the f irst line,
    then 9, then 7, then 6. So, this is how it is reduced. And then, there are many lines with 10
    syllables, some with 2 syllables, some with 3, 4. Wide variety of line lengths we have. So,
    metrical variations are bound to occur. We can, at best, call it polymetrical.
    (Refer Slide Time: 26:37)

    To give an overall impression of the two sections, The Burial of the Dead and The Game of
    Chess that we have seen in this poem, we can list the following points. The speaker of the
    poem, there are many speakers, you must understand. Many voices are there. Let us say the
    speaker prefers to die like the Cumaean Sibyl because the spring season brings and renews
    life which is meaningless and hopeless.

    The society is decayed and degenerate in all walks of life, including the rulers. The First
    World War was started because of the assassination of a king, due to several reasons and this
    is one of them. What remains in the modern world is a heap of broken images and a heap of
    dust. People do not have a sense of life at all in the alienated, unreal and hypocritical world.
    Madame Sosostris deceives meaning seekers. If he looks for some meaning, there are people
    to deceive us. The past too has its share of empty life as seen in the lives of Cleopatra,
    Elizabeth I, Philomela and the modern nervous woman, who is again connected with the mad
    and drowned Ophelia in this poem.
    (Refer Slide Time: 27:51)

    On the whole, we have seen the historical and literary context of TS Eliot who came up with
    an impersonal theory of poetry in his essay, ‘Tradition and the individual talent,’ writing this
    poem, The Waste Land with a huge publication history, a very interesting publication history
    for making money out of this poem.
    We looked at the structure of the poem, that is five sections and then we read selections from
    2 sections:section 1 and section 2. Analysed the poem linguistically and rhetorically, mainly
    rhetorically looking at the poetic devices, then, giving an overall impression of the poem.

    (Refer Slide Time: 28:34)

    Now, let us see some references. These references will specifically be useful to the first
    section. Of course, these references will be useful to the whole of the poem.